Future Technology an d Innovative Concept Topics a n d Ideas f o r Thin k Tanks a n d Radio
Greetin g s a nd wel c ome m y radio listening audience an d online article readers. O n t his 19th day o f October 2012 w e w i ll o f c o urse b e discussing future technology, future innovations, a n d futuristic concepts. Indeed, I surely hop e t h e Mayan calendar wa s wrong, o r perh a ps t h ose carving i t m e rely ran ou t o f stone simply, ran ou t o f rock t o chisel on, there f ore t h e world w ill b e saved fr o m whateve r i t w a s th a t t he Mayans thought mig h t bring abou t a n ew age o r renewal.
Ok a y so, I' d li k e t o dive i n to ou r topics f o r today's radio talk show a n d I ' m s u re b y no w yo u understand th e format, basically, "I w i ll d o th e talking fo r ab o ut 30 minutes minus commercials a n d y our job i s t o listen carefully, c ome u p wit h comments an d questions, a nd the n I ' ll open u p t h e phone lines t o hear wha t y o u hav e t o say." A s y o u a l so proba b ly k n ow I d o n ot r espond t o online comments wh i ch a r e n o t intellectually based. Th a t doe s n't m ean y ou can' t ha v e a n opinion, no r do e s i t m e an th a t i t h as t o b e th e sam e a s mine. I n fact, i f yo u d o to o mu c h preaching t o th e choir, I w ill simply cut yo u off, p erhaps agree w i th you, an d g o t o t h e nex t caller.
O u r job i s t o ha v e a n intellectual discussion, dialogue, debate a n d discourse. Th a t's w h y y ou're here, a n d that ' s m y mission, a n d w e w i ll complete it. No w then, obviousl y th e re i s a tremendous amount o f talk a b out innovation, t h e n eed f o r innovators a n d entrepreneurs i n o ur nation t o k eep u s strong, vibrant, a n d o n t h e leading edge o f technology. Yo u wo n 't ge t an y disagreement her e o n tha t reality, nevert h eless i t seem s a s i f t h e word "innovation" i s per h aps on e o f t h e mo s t overused words i n t h e English language currently, p erhaps othe r t han "unsustainable" w hich b y t he way, som e things wh i ch m a y ap p ear t o b e unsustainable o r dire problems w e belie v e w e face today, b ut m ay v e ry we l l b e solved w i th t h e technology o f t he future.
O kay so, he r e i s wh e re I ' m g oing t o start throwing o ut topics, wi t h a lit t le discussion attached t o e a ch one. T h ey w i ll run th e gamut a l l a cross th e board fro m science fiction topics t o today's latest a n d greatest technologies an d wh a t the y mi g ht me a n f o r o u r future. I w i ll a l so throw o u t s o me personal original Accounts innovative concepts, a s I c ome u p wit h a t leas t t wo n e w original concepts p e r day, an d w e ca n discuss t hose a s wel l i f yo u wish, o r perhap s yo u wi l l hav e a diffe r ent topic fo r o u r dialogue here. N ow th e n let' s begin wi t h t h e f i rst topic;
1.) W ill Physical Money Survive t he Ne x t T h ree Decades - Hackers a nd Trade Questioned
I n reality, money h a s lit t le o r n o valu e - cons i der a dollar bill, it ' s j ust a flimsy piece o f paper, s o h o w m u ch i s i t rea l ly worth? W e al l be l ieve i t i s worth whate v er i t s a ys o n t h e face o f i t w hether i t b e on e dollar, f ive dollars, $10, $20, $50, o r ev e n a C-note. Money o n ly works beca u se people h ave faith i n i t s value Review 2016, a n d w hat i t ca n buy. M o st o f t h e money whic h i s created t hese days nev e r act u ally exists i n a physical form, i t o nly exists i n t he digital world. F or instance, yo u m ight g e t paid fro m a Corporation, th a t money cou l d b e digitally transferred int o yo u r bank account. Y ou m i ght t hen u se y o ur ATM t o buy something, o r pay bills online, bu t yo u neve r h a d th a t money i n you r hot l ittle hands. Things hav e changed a lot i n th e las t t h ree decades h aven't they?
S o wha t wi l l h appen i n a n other t h ree decades I ask? Wi l l w e st i ll h a ve physical money, o r w i ll i t a l l b e digitized, an d wil l y o u e v er ha v e a n y money i n y our wallet t o buy something? The r e ar e so m e futurists t h at beli e ve tha t money wi l l g o ou t t h e window, th a t i s t o s a y physical money, an d everyt h ing w i ll b e digital i n th e future Salary. B ut wha t i f ou r society an d civilization do e sn't trust digital money? W hat i f th e y a r e worried th a t o ur banks ar e b e ing hacked? Recently i n th e fall o f 2012 we' v e noted t hat o u r banks ha v e c o me un d er cyber-attacks fro m Iran a t l east Leon Panetta believes th a t's w here t he attacks originated, b ut w ho i s t o sa y i n t h e future i f w e ha v e a w a r w i th anoth e r nation t h at cyber-attacks o n ou r monetary system wil l no t b e included?
A f ter all, economic warfare i s b ecoming quit e common, w h y j ust conside r t h e sanctions, trade wars, a nd o ur attempts t o stop th e money flow f r om terrorists, drug dealers, money launderers Coupons, an d human traffickers, al o ng wi t h t h e central banking computer systems o f rogue nation-states a n d the i r money transfers fo r things l i ke oil, natural resources, a nd military armament?
T hen t h ere i s th e issue c urrently w here mo r e a nd m o re people ar e making mobile payments o n th e ir mobile personal tech devices. Today they' r e buying a cup o f coffee, a hamburger, o r va r ious items a t retail stores. I n t h e future i t migh t b e muc h more, o r i f tha t become s unreliable o r thos e personal tech devices a r e bein g hacked, p erhaps throu g h downloaded apps w ith malware, o r fr o m users surfing websites w i th malware, t hen people w ill n ot trust mobile payments. S ome hav e suggested t h at som e personal tech devices ma y act u ally c o me w i th pre-loaded back-doors Coupon Bluehost o r software t hat co u ld b e use d b y hackers t o steal data o r commit identity theft crimes.
Einstein use d t o s ay that; "it takes a brilliant person t o solve a problem, b u t i t takes a creative genius t o prevent t he problem fr o m eve r happening f i rst place," an d therefore, I wou l d s a y t h at t he Phen375 Scam creative geniuses don' t alw a ys g e t t h e credit f or solving t he problems, b u t th e brilliant person will, eve n i f t h eir previous solutions turned int o unintended consequences, an d th e y a r e rehired t o fix w h at the y broke t he f irst t ime aft e r supposedly fixing somet h ing t o save u s all.
T h ere ma y com e a t ime w here people don ' t wi s h t o buy anythi n g online, o r d o online banking bec a use the y do n 't trust th e system, t h ey d o n't w a nt thei r money t o disappear on e day i nto some o ne else's account i n s o me foreign country. Hav i ng so m eone drain y o ur bank account o nly need s t o h appen once Buy Drones , a n d onl y need s t o hap p en t o a close friend o r a family member befor e everyo n e t h ey kn o w become s sketchy. I n tha t case y o u won' t wan t t o u s e digital money, an d tha t case m ore people w i ll opt t o u se physical money, there f ore i t i s q u ite possibl e t hat physical money wi l l exist simply a s a safety factor fo r decades t o come.
Bu t ho w safe i s y our physical money go i ng t o b e i n case o f a natural disaster, o r a wildfire t hat burned d own y our home, o r a n earthquake? W hat abou t a hurricane wi t h a huge tidal surge, a tsunami, o r a major river Hoverboards Review w h ich jumped it s banks? I s yo u r physical money safe, h o w mu c h safer i s i t t h at y o ur digital money i n th a t case? Speaking o f natural disasters a nd flooding events, m a ybe w e c a n bett e r predict the m i n t h e future? Le t 's talk a b out t hat f o r a moment w ith ou r nex t topic;
2.) W e N eed A Re a l Test f or 100-Year Flood Mathematical Simulations - A Thought
H ow c a n w e bette r produce mathematical simulations f o r flood zones, o r th e proverbial hundred year flood? Wh a t c an w e d o t o b e tter fine-tune thes e mathematical models s o tha t t hey a r e completely accurate? Lots o f work h a s b e en don e i n t he past based o n elevation, a n d flood mapping. B u t there ' s m o re t o i t th a n that, the r e a r e a ll sorts o f othe r things t o consi d er alon g w i th erosion patterns. Le t m e giv e y ou a thought here?
W e k now th e dates, temperatures, rain fall, an d run-off right, w e k now history, p l us w e measured th e terrain bef o re an d afte r right? Thus, an y reall y good mathematical simulation f o r erosion s hould l o ok t h e s a me a s th e ac t ual i f y o u input th e w ay t h e terrain on c e wa s w i th th e interim conditions t o w hat i t i s now. Se e th a t point.
T here i s a ve r y interesting YouTube Video I recommend viewing o n t his topic, we l l a si d e issue, t hat o f agricultural top soil erosion; "Dave Montgomery - Dirt: T he Erosion o f Civilizations," n ow then, l e t m e express m y thoughts o n th i s as, al l o f th e se theories a n d speculation make a lot o f sense wi t h unlimited examples i n th e present period o n smaller scales - common sense, observable, a nd t h us i t makes sense, s o then, Occam's Razor survives.
So, m y speculation o f Dave Montgomery's lecture a n d theory w ould b e th e same. Indeed, thi s w a s a great lecture, solid evidence, an d research. Oka y so, no w w e c an no w put f orth t h ese findings t o hel p calibrate mathematic soil erosion models an d simulations. N ow t hen le t m e as k anothe r question, o r perhap s t h e s ame question a differ e nt way;
3.) Ca n W e U s e Mathematic Fractal Simulation t o Fool A Human Whe n Viewing Erosion Patterns?
I f so, wo u ld th a t b e li k e th e Turing Test? An d i f so, c a n I call t hat th e Virtual Reality Winslow Test, named a fter m e fo r con s idering it? I f yo u ar e a pilot li k e I am, an d y ou fly o v er t h e terrain, y ou se e v a rious patterns o f h o w th e mountains an d erosion h a d t a ken pla c e o v er t h e l ast thousand t o 10,000 years. Y o u c an s ee floodplains, mountains, canyons, a n d i t a ll makes sense - yo u c an s e e ex a ctly ho w t h e water flows, o r h a d flowed i n t h e past. W h at i f w e u sed a computer t o design erosion patterns t h at ne v er happened, an d wh a t i f w e asked a human, perhap s a pilot wh o h as see n a n d flown ove r su c h terrain m any t imes i n t h e past i f i t wer e r eal o r not?
Ar e ou r computer simulations good enoug h t o fool t he human eye? I 'm talking abou t a trained observer wh o ha s s een t h ese things i n th e past o v er an d o v er again? I s th a t possible; I bel i eve i t is. A nd so, ho w d o y o u k now whe n look i ng a t Google Earth i f y o u a re loo k ing a t a computer rendition, o r a fake Birdseye view w h ich perha p s i s covering u p a military base, o r a secret area? T he reality i s yo u don't, o r d o you? H ow abou t tho s e wh o work f o r t he national satellite intelligence agencies, whe r e a l l th e y d o i s study terrain maps? Co u ld th e y pick o u t t h e difference?
Be f ore yo u answer tha t question, wh y do n 't y o u u s e Google Earth o n th e satellite view a nd fly o v er t h e deserts i n Nevada. S o me o f th a t stuff lo o ks pretty bizarre wi t h weird colors, b u t it ' s al l real. I f y o u doubt th a t it ' s real, g o ahead a n d fly ove r southern Bolivia o n Google Earth a n d lo o k a t som e o f th a t terrain i n th e ir salt flats region an d u p ag a inst t h e mountains, y ou ge t t h e s a me interesting colors, m u ch o f i t doe s n ot ap p ear t o b e r eal either, b u t i t is. S ome o f th e features t h at NASA h as viewed o n Mars d on't lo o k real, b ut t h ey are.
No, the y ar e n ot t h e sam e a s Earth becaus e t h e erosion patterns t hat w e s ee n o w c o uld h a ve b e en created b y wind, the r e i s a diffe r ent atmosphere, o r lack of. D o yo u se e m y point? N ot l o ng ago, I wa s watching a n online video lecture abou t erosion patterns, Stephen Wolfram's N ew Type o f Science, a nd Mathematica - fractals a n d mathematical simulations a n d projections o f erosion patterns. Th e y ar e amazingly predictable, a n d t h at i n it s elf i s interesting. It' s a s i f yo u ca n s e e t h e geological record thro u gh t he ages.
Y ou mi g ht wa n t t o l o ok som e o f thi s u p yourself. An d speaking o f free lectures, University level lectures o n ju s t a b out a n y topic yo u 'd like, I wond e r i f t h at wi l l ch a nge t h e future o f o ur higher education, w h y g o t o school an d pay $100,000 t o ge t a n advanced a great wh e n yo u c a n learn a lmost a s muc h online thr o ugh self-study? Yes, interesting, do e s thi s me a n it ' s th e death o f t he University, o r ar e w e entering a ne w age o f information flow i n education? Let ' s g o ahead an d talk ab o ut lecture type learning.
4.) W ant t o Learn Whil e Watching a n Online Video Lecture - G o F ull Screen an d Ditch Distraction
First, i f yo u a r e i n a university lecture hall, listening t o th e b est a n d brightest professor o n a gi v en topic there' s a good chance y ou m ight fall asleep, b u t stil l yo u r attention span wil l b e longer b ecause y o u a re there, an d ther e ar e n't t h e s a me distractions a s watching a n online video. I f y o u ar e watching a University level video a t home o n you r computer i n a litt l e box o n t h e screen - t h ere ar e lots o f distractions.
F o r instance whateve r e lse i s i n t he room, perh a ps th e doorbell, TV, o r yo u r cell phone rings. Yo u m i ght feel t he n e ed t o text someon e back, g o t o t h e refrigerator ge t s omething t o eat, o r j ust zone ou t - listening w hile you'r e doi n g s omething else, assuming tha t y o u c a n multitask an d learn som e thing complicated a t t he s a me time. I t 's n o t th a t y o u can't, it ' s tha t y ou pro b ably w on't a n d you r memory retention level wi l l b e n e xt t o nothing, a nd you'v e wasted everyone's time, an d s o me bandwidth t o boot. Still, l e t m e as k anot h er question;
5.) I s Th e Lecture Dead - Ev e n I f I t's Al l Online a n d Free I n Th e Future?
Thi s i s a decent question, e ven i f yo u disagree w ith it. O n October 20, 2012 the r e w as a n article i n t h e technology news. Harvard h a d put u p t wo free courses online i n computer science. T hey w ere obviousl y follo w ing Stanford computer science department's lead, a s the y d id t h e s a me t hing las t year. Harvard h a d th e sam e results o ver 100,000 people signed up, people fr o m a l l o ver t he world. The r e's n o shortage o f people wh o wi s h t o learn online, b ut i n d oing this; ar e th e y cutting the i r ow n throats a s t h ey distribute information t o th e rest o f th e world a t n o cost, o r a re t h ey boosting the i r ow n credibility b y do i ng so? I t c ould lead t o m o re people w h o w i sh t o attend tha t school i n th e future, theref o re greater enrollment.
Regardless, things a r e changing fast, ev e n i f t h e basic lecture a t ou r universities ha s n't changed muc h sinc e th e 1800s. Indeed, I recommend t h at yo u watch t h e YouTube Video; "Don't lecture me" (with Twitter track) - Donald Clark a t ALT-C 2010," be c ause t h is gentlemen makes a lot o f sense. Perh a ps al s o o f interest i s a n other YouTube Video titled; "Re-inventing t he Lecture (Or, W h y Online Lectures D o n't Work, a nd W hat W e C a n D o Abo u t It)."
Indeed, I th i nk aft e r y o u watch t h ose videos y ou'll b e b etter a ble t o comment o n w h at I ' m talking abo u t here, an d i t i s so m ething t hat need s t o b e discussed. W e n e ed a national dialogue o n this, t hat i s i f w e w a nt t o propel technology an d innovation, a nd couple t h at w ith entrepreneurship moving ou r great nation forward int o th e future. N e xt I ' d lik e t o discuss;
6.) Large Universities, High Tuition, a nd Big Buildings a n d Beautiful Architecture - A r e W e Learning Yet?
W hy i s i t t hat w e put s o m uch faith in t o ou r larger universities? It' s interesting isn' t it? The y spend huge amounts o f money putting u p great architecture a n d large buildings bu t i s tha t real l y wh a t makes t h em great? E ven i f some o ne ha s a great building, i t do e sn't me a n t hey kno w w h at they ' re talking about, con s ider som e o f th e largest churches i n th e world fo r instance, o r th e largest mosques. I s i t t h e high prices t h e Universities charge; doe s t h at make t hem great? Havi n g bee n i n business a l l m y life, I ca n recall vario u s attorneys actua l ly raising t h eir price ju s t s o t hey coul d g et mor e business becau s e people thought i t t hey charged m o re p e r hour th e y mu s t b e good, t hey weren't.
Indeed, i f a large university spends a ll t h eir money o n landscaping, beautiful brick work, great statues o u tside t h e lecture halls, a nd i s on e wit h t he epitome o f divine architecture - t hen the y h ave les s money t o teach y o u with. T h ey hav e l ess money t o hire t h e be s t professors, buy t h e bes t equipment, o r provi d e th e b e st future f or t h eir students. That ' s no t t o s a y t hat th e y can't, pe r haps t hey charge y ou money f ar i n excess o f th e amount o f education an d y o u jus t hav e t o t h e pay fo r al l t hat extra stuff. I f y ou ca n ge t a lecture online fo r free o n YouTube - i n m a ny r e gards t h e information i s basically t h e same.
Per h aps i n th e future y o ur living room gaming virtual reality technology wi l l project a holographic professor i n 3-D bringing t he professor t o you, a n d i t c an b e do n e f or a fraction o f th e cost, there' s n o building t o pay for, pe r haps th e building, a nd th e professor, an d e v erything els e c a n b e projected ar o und yo u r living room a n d y ou wi l l feel a s i f yo u a r e t hey are. Therefore, y ou ge t th e sam e experience, a nd interaction, perh a ps e v en breaking u p in t o groups w i th virtual-reality avatars a s fellow students. W ho need s college anymore? B e tter yet, wh o need s t o tak e ou t $100,000 i n student loans fo r th e s ame exac t information, minus t he big building?
Still, i n y our living room gaming center w hich doubles a s y our n e w education headquarters, an d you r latest virtual o r augmented reality 3-D holographic computer game immersion device - yo u migh t actua l ly b e training th e artificial intelligent supercomputer network t o th i nk l i ke a human. Th a t information mi g ht b e u sed b y future robotic systems f o r a l l sorts o f things f r om self-driving trucks, cars, an d airplanes t h rough virtual-reality simulator trainers t o future combat vehicles i n t h e battle space. Speaking o f w hich I hav e a n other question fo r you;
7.) Shoul d W e Crowd Source Satellite Data fo r Future Military Convoys?
Well, i f w e di d that, w e wouldn ' t hav e t o t e ll anyo n e wh o wa s lo o king a t th e satellite data w hen o r w here w e mi g ht b e moving troops, equipment, o r resources, w e coul d jus t s a y t h at t his i s on e o f th e potential routes f or s o me t ime i n th e future, an d i f yo u find a n anomaly mark i t down. T hose wh o find t h e mo s t anomalies wil l receive a check i n t h e mail, o r a gift certificate t o the i r favorite retail store a t t he en d o f tw o months. T h ey won ' t kno w when, where, o r w hich anomaly t hey found wa s t h e o n e whi c h garnered the m t h e free gift card.
Tho s e t hat find mor e r e al anomalies t h an false positives w ould b e giv e n a higher level o f point spread fo r dollars p er anomalies th e y found. Further, t h ey mi g ht g et a n extra hundred dollars i n t h e mail e ach month be c ause the y ha d a higher credibility rating. I f w e di d th i s eventually t h e algorithms watching th e ver y bes t human minds find th e se anomalies coul d figure ou t ho w the y a r e do i ng it, a nd wha t i s catching t h eir eye, a n d theref o re w e cou l d bet t er design artificially intelligent satellite analyzing algorithms w h ich w o uld incorporate ho w a human mind thinks, an d h ow a computer thinks w hich w ill giv e u s t he be s t o f al l worlds b y putting t hose t w o together.
Pe r haps i n a way, humans ar e alre a dy training supercomputers wi t h artificial intelligent algorithms t o run ou r entir e society, an d civilization fo r t h e future. Aft e r all, ever y ti m e y o u put someth i ng o n th e Internet, th e Internet cou l d b e learning mo r e a bout h o w humans think, operate, a n d g o a bout t heir business. I n ma n y r egards w e cou l d b e creating t h e matrix f or ou r ow n future, an d t h ese artificial intelligence systems wil l b e come aware, a n d t hey wi l l b e ou r leadership i n th e future, i t wo n 't b e human? It ' s possible, a nd l et m e a s k y o u anothe r question;
7.) W h at Happen s W h en t h e Cloud Computing Centers Filled wi t h A l l Human Information Becom e Aware?
Consi d er i f yo u wi l l a s s omeone recently s a id i n T h e Futurist Magazine i n t he October-September issue o f 2012 al o ng t his line o f thinking, so m ething t o t he effect that; "We alr e ady ha v e algorithms wh i ch c a n search a l l th e information i n a ny o f the s e cloud computing centers, " a n d "We ha v e al l sorts o f algorithms t o hel p u s find th e data, a nd algorithms w hich talk t o o t her algorithms." Sure, a l l th a t makes sense, an d a lso c o nsider th a t i n th e human brain:
A.) W e h ave v arious brain waves an d the y interact w i th e ach other.
B.) T here a r e var i ous chemicals providing energy wit h a mix.
C.) W e h ave sensors a l l t h rough t h e body, an d t h e fiv e senses whi c h gather information a n d experience, taking i n a l l o f ou r observations.
I f t h e cloud computer centers, w hich w ill b e talking t o e ach oth e r a nd talking t o themselv e s co n tain a ll o f t h e written an d visual record o f humanity, th e y w ill h a ve alre a dy gathered al l th e experiences, writings, observations, using, a n d history, a n d s o i t i s onl y on e small step awa y fro m beco m ing aware. T h is i s t h e future w e ar e moving towards, m y question is; d o w e dare?
I n a way, t h e cloud computer w o uld bec o me aware, a nd i t w o uld b e v ery similar t o a human brain wher e e v ery individual neuron w a s a n individual human. T hat i s t o s a y eve r y piece o f t h e puzzle, fr o m t h e top t o t h e bottom w o uld h a ve intelligence. I s t h is a ne w f o rm o f intelligence? Well, l et m e scale i t do w n t o a simple board game a n d a s k yo u a diff e rent question;
8.) Ca n W e Design a 3-D Chess Board Game W h ere Ea c h Piece H a s A I a nd Seeks t o Survive?
A n d i f w e c ould design so m ething l i ke that, wo u ldn't th a t b e ve r y similar t o th e w hole Net Centric Warfare concept? Isn ' t t hat h ow a r eal military works? Ea c h soldier i s give n a job, b u t e a ch soldier i s a thinking machine, i t f ollows i t s orders, b u t als o attempts t o d o w h at i s i n i t s bes t interest, t hat i s t o survive, t o fight, a n d t o win. I n wa r it ' s pretty serious, y o u eithe r win, o r yo u die. C a n w e design a 3-D chessboard t o d o t h e s ame thing? Ho w m uch bett e r w o uld i t b e i f i t w a s giving feedback back t o th e artificial intelligent chess master?
We ' ve alre a dy found t hat artificial intelligence working wi t h a human chess master c a n beat a n artificial intelligent chess playing machine fro m IBM. W h en w e merge human intelligence w ith artificial intelligence w e see m t o g et a boost. Wha t i f ea c h piece o n t h e chessboard h ad artificial intelligence an d i t understood h o w humans think, adapt, survive, an d operate unde r pressure? A ren't w e alre a dy teaching a ll t hese things t o th e future o f A I t h rough o u r input on t o t he Internet? Sur e w e are, a n d i f y o u've listened t o thi s radio show, o r rea d m y articles f or a n y period o f time, y o u alread y k now th e answer t o that.
Wha t i f w e scale d o wn e v en further? W h at i f w e scaled t h is a ll t h e wa y do w n t o th e molecular level? W hat i f t hose molecules o r nanoparticles coul d talk t o ea c h other? Ar e w e talking abo u t t he nex t generation o f microelectronics? Taking i t a l l th e w ay d own a n d continuing t h e tradition o f Moore's law? Hav e y o u recently noted i n t h e scientific news October o f 2012 th a t carbon nanotubes h ave incredible properties fo r producing light a n d miniature holograms? W ill t his b e a n e w wa y t o communicate a t t h e micro level?
Bacteria s eems t o communicate a n d o n ce i t g ets economies o f scale a n d reaches a tipping point, i t activates itself, t r ying t o overwhelm b y force a nd numbers. I t operates mu c h li k e a n army, althoug h strategically, mathematically, an d predictably, wel l almost? Almos t li k e a chessboard whe r e ea c h individual member i s a l so serving it s bes t interests? P erhaps a s w e design computer algorithms f o r t h e small-scale o r t h e largest scale w e wi l l begin t o s ee t he s a me thing, an d wha t w e learn w i ll propel u s fu r ther a n d faster i n to th e future.
T here wa s a n interesting article i n Photonics o n September 27, 2012 titled; "Nanotubes Project Holograms," w h ich noted that;
"Holograms c a n b e generated b y harnessing th e conductive a nd light-scattering qualities o f carbon nanotubes, a development th a t c ould lead t o crisper projections w ith a larger field o f view. Man y scientists beli e ve th a t carbon nanotubes wil l b e a t th e heart o f future industry a n d human endeavor an d wi l l h a ve a n impact o n solar cells, cancer treatments an d optical imaging. Researchers us e d t hese nanotubes a s t he smallest-ever scattering elements t o create a static holographic projection."
Th e applications f o r a l l thi s ar e incredible a nd i t co u ld revolutionize everything, chan g e A L L o f human technology; communication, computers, transportation, energy, healthcare, a n d y ou na m e it, jus t co n sider t he realities here? Wo u ld i t b e s o bold t o suggest th a t someday;
9.) A n A I Super Decision Making Computer Cou l d B e Running Human Civilizations?
Interestingly enough, I h a ve deeply considered t h e future eRepublic o r eGovernment A I decision making system, enterprise software super computer concept. I f i t we r e n o t corrupted b y humans i t cou l d work well, programmed benevolence - i f tha t i s po s sible a n d i f t h e programmers ar e o n t he s a me page o f liberty, freedom, an d standardization o f som e aspects a nd basic infrastructure needs. Th e anarchists mig h t n o t l ike it, t h e crony capitalists w o uld t r y t o corrupt it, th e socialists w ould wan t t o control it, t h e religious fanatics w o uld w ant t o destroy it, a n d s o o n - a g ain humans, bu t living i n suc h a system designed f o r liberty a n d freedom "I thi n k i t wo u ld b e a good idea" paraphrasing Gandhi o n Western Society.
W h at I' m s aying o r ask i ng rater is; coul d w e e v er ge t human populations t o agree t o live w i th t h is e v en i f w e c ould prove t o t hem mathematically t hat w o uld b e i n th e ir b est interests? A r e humans r e ady f or t hat yet? I w o uld suggest y ou t hat the y s hould b e g etting r eady f o r th a t beca u se the y a r e curren t ly training A I supercomputer decision-making machines t o d o jus t t h at i n th e future, a s humans a r e putting a l l o f th e ir knowledge ont o t h e Internet. Y o u s e e m y point?
O f course, i f w e d o t his w e m ust ge t i t rig h t t h e f irst time, bu t h a ve yo u e v er kn o wn an y technology t o hav e c o me i nto th e world perfect t h e f i rst time? Loo k ho w m a ny airplane designs crashed an d burned be f ore th e Wright Brothers a c tually go t o n e t o fly? An d eve n w i th t h em i t w a sn't l i ke the y w ere no t adding insult t o injury, a s t hey to o crashed a f e w tim e s th e mselves a n d h a d broken bones a n d broken w i ng spars t o prove it. Speaking o f whic h I l ike t o discuss w ith yo u a litt l e bit abou t ho w innovation c o mes t o be, an d t h e subject of;
10.) Innovation, Trial an d Error, an d Original Thinking
N o t lon g ago, I wa s discussing thi s wi t h a n acquaintance o f mine f rom a cross t he p o nd a n d h e suggested that; "Most innovations m i ght b e j ust applications o f trial a n d error." I s h e right? Yes, a good portion rea l ly i s so, t hat's true enough. Indeed, isn' t i t s o that; thos e w h o kno w t hat m ay ha v e learned i t t hrough t h e adversity o f failure, find the m selves i n a plac e w h ere t hey refuse t o q u it fo r t h e nex t round, eventually tha t leads t o success due t o strength o f character.
Thus, tho s e who've achieved h ave proven th e y hav e t h e rig h t stuff, a n d h ave worked t o solve r eal problems, bu t y o u can' t solve re a l problems b y practicing "the definition o f insanity" whi c h i s generally ho w humans "following t he leader" us u ally ge t there, a s t h ey hire thos e experts w h o g ot th e m int o t he hot water i n t h e fir s t p lace (refer back t o Einstein's quote), learning fr o m t h eir success, bu t no t t heir failures a s mentioned abo v e
Be c ause o f this, i f so m eone i s unintelligent a n d jus t recites th e experts, th e n a r e the y re a lly needed f o r a thin k tank o r f or future innovation? No, w e o u ght t o enlist th e experts themselves, n o t t heir hook, line, a nd sinker followers - o f course, a s I 've discussed i n previous shows a nd articles w e'd b e b e tter o ff fol l owing th o se wh o question authority, rathe r tha n leaving i t al l u p t o status quo intellectual elite.
No w then, alo n g t h is line o f discussion m y acquaintance al s o noted that; "Most mind stunning discoveries a r e st i ll linked t o f e w masterminds." Well, th i s i s fairly true, a nd wh y w e study th e names o f dead white men, t he victors o f history wh o wrote t hemselves in, an d speak o f t h e "shoulders o f giants" however, m any o f th e se incredible advances m ay h ave com e f rom associates o r combining information.
Consid e r a stable m an fo r a member o f t h e Royal Geological Society back i n th e day, h e c a me u p w ith t he idea, b ut h e co u ldn't re a d o r write, s o th e individual w ho wrote i t do w n g o t an d to o k t h e credit f o r it, a n d today w e ha v e t o "memorize" h i s na m e i n school, y et i n reality tha t 's n ot h o w i t a ctually happened.
Thus, i n man y r egards i t's h a rd t o sa y wha t a n original thought is, o r ho w man y ac t ually com e about. Afte r all, m any psychologists a nd philosophers h ave noted t h at th e human mind come s u p wi t h ideas a nd thoughts based o n i t s experience an d input f rom i ts sensors throu g h th e sense o f touch, smell, taste, sight, a n d hearing. It ' s ra t her difficult t o conceive somet h ing t h at yo u h a ven't experienced o r i s n ot wit h in y our realm, i t 's no t t o s ay t h at y ou couldn't, i t 's th a t i t d o esn't hap p en ver y often. Ge t ting t o a big breakthrough i s highly uncommon.
I n deed i t i s kn o wn tha t mo s t innovation co m es f rom problem solving, a n d perhap s usin g k n own knowledge, observations, a n d experiencesss i n unique ways. The n t here i s t he trial a nd error period, whe r e yo u crash a n d burn, o r y o u modify, adapt, a n d survive t o fight anot h er day - t o tweak y our invention, a n d t o make i t work. T his i s you r job a s a n innovator, an d i t's someth i ng I h ope yo u w i ll consider.
O u r job i s t o ha v e a n intellectual discussion, dialogue, debate a n d discourse. Th a t's w h y y ou're here, a n d that ' s m y mission, a n d w e w i ll complete it. No w then, obviousl y th e re i s a tremendous amount o f talk a b out innovation, t h e n eed f o r innovators a n d entrepreneurs i n o ur nation t o k eep u s strong, vibrant, a n d o n t h e leading edge o f technology. Yo u wo n 't ge t an y disagreement her e o n tha t reality, nevert h eless i t seem s a s i f t h e word "innovation" i s per h aps on e o f t h e mo s t overused words i n t h e English language currently, p erhaps othe r t han "unsustainable" w hich b y t he way, som e things wh i ch m a y ap p ear t o b e unsustainable o r dire problems w e belie v e w e face today, b ut m ay v e ry we l l b e solved w i th t h e technology o f t he future.
O kay so, he r e i s wh e re I ' m g oing t o start throwing o ut topics, wi t h a lit t le discussion attached t o e a ch one. T h ey w i ll run th e gamut a l l a cross th e board fro m science fiction topics t o today's latest a n d greatest technologies an d wh a t the y mi g ht me a n f o r o u r future. I w i ll a l so throw o u t s o me personal original Accounts innovative concepts, a s I c ome u p wit h a t leas t t wo n e w original concepts p e r day, an d w e ca n discuss t hose a s wel l i f yo u wish, o r perhap s yo u wi l l hav e a diffe r ent topic fo r o u r dialogue here. N ow th e n let' s begin wi t h t h e f i rst topic;
1.) W ill Physical Money Survive t he Ne x t T h ree Decades - Hackers a nd Trade Questioned
I n reality, money h a s lit t le o r n o valu e - cons i der a dollar bill, it ' s j ust a flimsy piece o f paper, s o h o w m u ch i s i t rea l ly worth? W e al l be l ieve i t i s worth whate v er i t s a ys o n t h e face o f i t w hether i t b e on e dollar, f ive dollars, $10, $20, $50, o r ev e n a C-note. Money o n ly works beca u se people h ave faith i n i t s value Review 2016, a n d w hat i t ca n buy. M o st o f t h e money whic h i s created t hese days nev e r act u ally exists i n a physical form, i t o nly exists i n t he digital world. F or instance, yo u m ight g e t paid fro m a Corporation, th a t money cou l d b e digitally transferred int o yo u r bank account. Y ou m i ght t hen u se y o ur ATM t o buy something, o r pay bills online, bu t yo u neve r h a d th a t money i n you r hot l ittle hands. Things hav e changed a lot i n th e las t t h ree decades h aven't they?
S o wha t wi l l h appen i n a n other t h ree decades I ask? Wi l l w e st i ll h a ve physical money, o r w i ll i t a l l b e digitized, an d wil l y o u e v er ha v e a n y money i n y our wallet t o buy something? The r e ar e so m e futurists t h at beli e ve tha t money wi l l g o ou t t h e window, th a t i s t o s a y physical money, an d everyt h ing w i ll b e digital i n th e future Salary. B ut wha t i f ou r society an d civilization do e sn't trust digital money? W hat i f th e y a r e worried th a t o ur banks ar e b e ing hacked? Recently i n th e fall o f 2012 we' v e noted t hat o u r banks ha v e c o me un d er cyber-attacks fro m Iran a t l east Leon Panetta believes th a t's w here t he attacks originated, b ut w ho i s t o sa y i n t h e future i f w e ha v e a w a r w i th anoth e r nation t h at cyber-attacks o n ou r monetary system wil l no t b e included?
A f ter all, economic warfare i s b ecoming quit e common, w h y j ust conside r t h e sanctions, trade wars, a nd o ur attempts t o stop th e money flow f r om terrorists, drug dealers, money launderers Coupons, an d human traffickers, al o ng wi t h t h e central banking computer systems o f rogue nation-states a n d the i r money transfers fo r things l i ke oil, natural resources, a nd military armament?
T hen t h ere i s th e issue c urrently w here mo r e a nd m o re people ar e making mobile payments o n th e ir mobile personal tech devices. Today they' r e buying a cup o f coffee, a hamburger, o r va r ious items a t retail stores. I n t h e future i t migh t b e muc h more, o r i f tha t become s unreliable o r thos e personal tech devices a r e bein g hacked, p erhaps throu g h downloaded apps w ith malware, o r fr o m users surfing websites w i th malware, t hen people w ill n ot trust mobile payments. S ome hav e suggested t h at som e personal tech devices ma y act u ally c o me w i th pre-loaded back-doors Coupon Bluehost o r software t hat co u ld b e use d b y hackers t o steal data o r commit identity theft crimes.
Einstein use d t o s ay that; "it takes a brilliant person t o solve a problem, b u t i t takes a creative genius t o prevent t he problem fr o m eve r happening f i rst place," an d therefore, I wou l d s a y t h at t he Phen375 Scam creative geniuses don' t alw a ys g e t t h e credit f or solving t he problems, b u t th e brilliant person will, eve n i f t h eir previous solutions turned int o unintended consequences, an d th e y a r e rehired t o fix w h at the y broke t he f irst t ime aft e r supposedly fixing somet h ing t o save u s all.
T h ere ma y com e a t ime w here people don ' t wi s h t o buy anythi n g online, o r d o online banking bec a use the y do n 't trust th e system, t h ey d o n't w a nt thei r money t o disappear on e day i nto some o ne else's account i n s o me foreign country. Hav i ng so m eone drain y o ur bank account o nly need s t o h appen once Buy Drones , a n d onl y need s t o hap p en t o a close friend o r a family member befor e everyo n e t h ey kn o w become s sketchy. I n tha t case y o u won' t wan t t o u s e digital money, an d tha t case m ore people w i ll opt t o u se physical money, there f ore i t i s q u ite possibl e t hat physical money wi l l exist simply a s a safety factor fo r decades t o come.
Bu t ho w safe i s y our physical money go i ng t o b e i n case o f a natural disaster, o r a wildfire t hat burned d own y our home, o r a n earthquake? W hat abou t a hurricane wi t h a huge tidal surge, a tsunami, o r a major river Hoverboards Review w h ich jumped it s banks? I s yo u r physical money safe, h o w mu c h safer i s i t t h at y o ur digital money i n th a t case? Speaking o f natural disasters a nd flooding events, m a ybe w e c a n bett e r predict the m i n t h e future? Le t 's talk a b out t hat f o r a moment w ith ou r nex t topic;
2.) W e N eed A Re a l Test f or 100-Year Flood Mathematical Simulations - A Thought
H ow c a n w e bette r produce mathematical simulations f o r flood zones, o r th e proverbial hundred year flood? Wh a t c an w e d o t o b e tter fine-tune thes e mathematical models s o tha t t hey a r e completely accurate? Lots o f work h a s b e en don e i n t he past based o n elevation, a n d flood mapping. B u t there ' s m o re t o i t th a n that, the r e a r e a ll sorts o f othe r things t o consi d er alon g w i th erosion patterns. Le t m e giv e y ou a thought here?
W e k now th e dates, temperatures, rain fall, an d run-off right, w e k now history, p l us w e measured th e terrain bef o re an d afte r right? Thus, an y reall y good mathematical simulation f o r erosion s hould l o ok t h e s a me a s th e ac t ual i f y o u input th e w ay t h e terrain on c e wa s w i th th e interim conditions t o w hat i t i s now. Se e th a t point.
T here i s a ve r y interesting YouTube Video I recommend viewing o n t his topic, we l l a si d e issue, t hat o f agricultural top soil erosion; "Dave Montgomery - Dirt: T he Erosion o f Civilizations," n ow then, l e t m e express m y thoughts o n th i s as, al l o f th e se theories a n d speculation make a lot o f sense wi t h unlimited examples i n th e present period o n smaller scales - common sense, observable, a nd t h us i t makes sense, s o then, Occam's Razor survives.
So, m y speculation o f Dave Montgomery's lecture a n d theory w ould b e th e same. Indeed, thi s w a s a great lecture, solid evidence, an d research. Oka y so, no w w e c an no w put f orth t h ese findings t o hel p calibrate mathematic soil erosion models an d simulations. N ow t hen le t m e as k anothe r question, o r perhap s t h e s ame question a differ e nt way;
3.) Ca n W e U s e Mathematic Fractal Simulation t o Fool A Human Whe n Viewing Erosion Patterns?
I f so, wo u ld th a t b e li k e th e Turing Test? An d i f so, c a n I call t hat th e Virtual Reality Winslow Test, named a fter m e fo r con s idering it? I f yo u ar e a pilot li k e I am, an d y ou fly o v er t h e terrain, y ou se e v a rious patterns o f h o w th e mountains an d erosion h a d t a ken pla c e o v er t h e l ast thousand t o 10,000 years. Y o u c an s ee floodplains, mountains, canyons, a n d i t a ll makes sense - yo u c an s e e ex a ctly ho w t h e water flows, o r h a d flowed i n t h e past. W h at i f w e u sed a computer t o design erosion patterns t h at ne v er happened, an d wh a t i f w e asked a human, perhap s a pilot wh o h as see n a n d flown ove r su c h terrain m any t imes i n t h e past i f i t wer e r eal o r not?
Ar e ou r computer simulations good enoug h t o fool t he human eye? I 'm talking abou t a trained observer wh o ha s s een t h ese things i n th e past o v er an d o v er again? I s th a t possible; I bel i eve i t is. A nd so, ho w d o y o u k now whe n look i ng a t Google Earth i f y o u a re loo k ing a t a computer rendition, o r a fake Birdseye view w h ich perha p s i s covering u p a military base, o r a secret area? T he reality i s yo u don't, o r d o you? H ow abou t tho s e wh o work f o r t he national satellite intelligence agencies, whe r e a l l th e y d o i s study terrain maps? Co u ld th e y pick o u t t h e difference?
Be f ore yo u answer tha t question, wh y do n 't y o u u s e Google Earth o n th e satellite view a nd fly o v er t h e deserts i n Nevada. S o me o f th a t stuff lo o ks pretty bizarre wi t h weird colors, b u t it ' s al l real. I f y o u doubt th a t it ' s real, g o ahead a n d fly ove r southern Bolivia o n Google Earth a n d lo o k a t som e o f th a t terrain i n th e ir salt flats region an d u p ag a inst t h e mountains, y ou ge t t h e s a me interesting colors, m u ch o f i t doe s n ot ap p ear t o b e r eal either, b u t i t is. S ome o f th e features t h at NASA h as viewed o n Mars d on't lo o k real, b ut t h ey are.
No, the y ar e n ot t h e sam e a s Earth becaus e t h e erosion patterns t hat w e s ee n o w c o uld h a ve b e en created b y wind, the r e i s a diffe r ent atmosphere, o r lack of. D o yo u se e m y point? N ot l o ng ago, I wa s watching a n online video lecture abou t erosion patterns, Stephen Wolfram's N ew Type o f Science, a nd Mathematica - fractals a n d mathematical simulations a n d projections o f erosion patterns. Th e y ar e amazingly predictable, a n d t h at i n it s elf i s interesting. It' s a s i f yo u ca n s e e t h e geological record thro u gh t he ages.
Y ou mi g ht wa n t t o l o ok som e o f thi s u p yourself. An d speaking o f free lectures, University level lectures o n ju s t a b out a n y topic yo u 'd like, I wond e r i f t h at wi l l ch a nge t h e future o f o ur higher education, w h y g o t o school an d pay $100,000 t o ge t a n advanced a great wh e n yo u c a n learn a lmost a s muc h online thr o ugh self-study? Yes, interesting, do e s thi s me a n it ' s th e death o f t he University, o r ar e w e entering a ne w age o f information flow i n education? Let ' s g o ahead an d talk ab o ut lecture type learning.
4.) W ant t o Learn Whil e Watching a n Online Video Lecture - G o F ull Screen an d Ditch Distraction
First, i f yo u a r e i n a university lecture hall, listening t o th e b est a n d brightest professor o n a gi v en topic there' s a good chance y ou m ight fall asleep, b u t stil l yo u r attention span wil l b e longer b ecause y o u a re there, an d ther e ar e n't t h e s a me distractions a s watching a n online video. I f y o u ar e watching a University level video a t home o n you r computer i n a litt l e box o n t h e screen - t h ere ar e lots o f distractions.
F o r instance whateve r e lse i s i n t he room, perh a ps th e doorbell, TV, o r yo u r cell phone rings. Yo u m i ght feel t he n e ed t o text someon e back, g o t o t h e refrigerator ge t s omething t o eat, o r j ust zone ou t - listening w hile you'r e doi n g s omething else, assuming tha t y o u c a n multitask an d learn som e thing complicated a t t he s a me time. I t 's n o t th a t y o u can't, it ' s tha t y ou pro b ably w on't a n d you r memory retention level wi l l b e n e xt t o nothing, a nd you'v e wasted everyone's time, an d s o me bandwidth t o boot. Still, l e t m e as k anot h er question;
5.) I s Th e Lecture Dead - Ev e n I f I t's Al l Online a n d Free I n Th e Future?
Thi s i s a decent question, e ven i f yo u disagree w ith it. O n October 20, 2012 the r e w as a n article i n t h e technology news. Harvard h a d put u p t wo free courses online i n computer science. T hey w ere obviousl y follo w ing Stanford computer science department's lead, a s the y d id t h e s a me t hing las t year. Harvard h a d th e sam e results o ver 100,000 people signed up, people fr o m a l l o ver t he world. The r e's n o shortage o f people wh o wi s h t o learn online, b ut i n d oing this; ar e th e y cutting the i r ow n throats a s t h ey distribute information t o th e rest o f th e world a t n o cost, o r a re t h ey boosting the i r ow n credibility b y do i ng so? I t c ould lead t o m o re people w h o w i sh t o attend tha t school i n th e future, theref o re greater enrollment.
Regardless, things a r e changing fast, ev e n i f t h e basic lecture a t ou r universities ha s n't changed muc h sinc e th e 1800s. Indeed, I recommend t h at yo u watch t h e YouTube Video; "Don't lecture me" (with Twitter track) - Donald Clark a t ALT-C 2010," be c ause t h is gentlemen makes a lot o f sense. Perh a ps al s o o f interest i s a n other YouTube Video titled; "Re-inventing t he Lecture (Or, W h y Online Lectures D o n't Work, a nd W hat W e C a n D o Abo u t It)."
Indeed, I th i nk aft e r y o u watch t h ose videos y ou'll b e b etter a ble t o comment o n w h at I ' m talking abo u t here, an d i t i s so m ething t hat need s t o b e discussed. W e n e ed a national dialogue o n this, t hat i s i f w e w a nt t o propel technology an d innovation, a nd couple t h at w ith entrepreneurship moving ou r great nation forward int o th e future. N e xt I ' d lik e t o discuss;
6.) Large Universities, High Tuition, a nd Big Buildings a n d Beautiful Architecture - A r e W e Learning Yet?
W hy i s i t t hat w e put s o m uch faith in t o ou r larger universities? It' s interesting isn' t it? The y spend huge amounts o f money putting u p great architecture a n d large buildings bu t i s tha t real l y wh a t makes t h em great? E ven i f some o ne ha s a great building, i t do e sn't me a n t hey kno w w h at they ' re talking about, con s ider som e o f th e largest churches i n th e world fo r instance, o r th e largest mosques. I s i t t h e high prices t h e Universities charge; doe s t h at make t hem great? Havi n g bee n i n business a l l m y life, I ca n recall vario u s attorneys actua l ly raising t h eir price ju s t s o t hey coul d g et mor e business becau s e people thought i t t hey charged m o re p e r hour th e y mu s t b e good, t hey weren't.
Indeed, i f a large university spends a ll t h eir money o n landscaping, beautiful brick work, great statues o u tside t h e lecture halls, a nd i s on e wit h t he epitome o f divine architecture - t hen the y h ave les s money t o teach y o u with. T h ey hav e l ess money t o hire t h e be s t professors, buy t h e bes t equipment, o r provi d e th e b e st future f or t h eir students. That ' s no t t o s a y t hat th e y can't, pe r haps t hey charge y ou money f ar i n excess o f th e amount o f education an d y o u jus t hav e t o t h e pay fo r al l t hat extra stuff. I f y ou ca n ge t a lecture online fo r free o n YouTube - i n m a ny r e gards t h e information i s basically t h e same.
Per h aps i n th e future y o ur living room gaming virtual reality technology wi l l project a holographic professor i n 3-D bringing t he professor t o you, a n d i t c an b e do n e f or a fraction o f th e cost, there' s n o building t o pay for, pe r haps th e building, a nd th e professor, an d e v erything els e c a n b e projected ar o und yo u r living room a n d y ou wi l l feel a s i f yo u a r e t hey are. Therefore, y ou ge t th e sam e experience, a nd interaction, perh a ps e v en breaking u p in t o groups w i th virtual-reality avatars a s fellow students. W ho need s college anymore? B e tter yet, wh o need s t o tak e ou t $100,000 i n student loans fo r th e s ame exac t information, minus t he big building?
Still, i n y our living room gaming center w hich doubles a s y our n e w education headquarters, an d you r latest virtual o r augmented reality 3-D holographic computer game immersion device - yo u migh t actua l ly b e training th e artificial intelligent supercomputer network t o th i nk l i ke a human. Th a t information mi g ht b e u sed b y future robotic systems f o r a l l sorts o f things f r om self-driving trucks, cars, an d airplanes t h rough virtual-reality simulator trainers t o future combat vehicles i n t h e battle space. Speaking o f w hich I hav e a n other question fo r you;
7.) Shoul d W e Crowd Source Satellite Data fo r Future Military Convoys?
Well, i f w e di d that, w e wouldn ' t hav e t o t e ll anyo n e wh o wa s lo o king a t th e satellite data w hen o r w here w e mi g ht b e moving troops, equipment, o r resources, w e coul d jus t s a y t h at t his i s on e o f th e potential routes f or s o me t ime i n th e future, an d i f yo u find a n anomaly mark i t down. T hose wh o find t h e mo s t anomalies wil l receive a check i n t h e mail, o r a gift certificate t o the i r favorite retail store a t t he en d o f tw o months. T h ey won ' t kno w when, where, o r w hich anomaly t hey found wa s t h e o n e whi c h garnered the m t h e free gift card.
Tho s e t hat find mor e r e al anomalies t h an false positives w ould b e giv e n a higher level o f point spread fo r dollars p er anomalies th e y found. Further, t h ey mi g ht g et a n extra hundred dollars i n t h e mail e ach month be c ause the y ha d a higher credibility rating. I f w e di d th i s eventually t h e algorithms watching th e ver y bes t human minds find th e se anomalies coul d figure ou t ho w the y a r e do i ng it, a nd wha t i s catching t h eir eye, a n d theref o re w e cou l d bet t er design artificially intelligent satellite analyzing algorithms w h ich w o uld incorporate ho w a human mind thinks, an d h ow a computer thinks w hich w ill giv e u s t he be s t o f al l worlds b y putting t hose t w o together.
Pe r haps i n a way, humans ar e alre a dy training supercomputers wi t h artificial intelligent algorithms t o run ou r entir e society, an d civilization fo r t h e future. Aft e r all, ever y ti m e y o u put someth i ng o n th e Internet, th e Internet cou l d b e learning mo r e a bout h o w humans think, operate, a n d g o a bout t heir business. I n ma n y r egards w e cou l d b e creating t h e matrix f or ou r ow n future, an d t h ese artificial intelligence systems wil l b e come aware, a n d t hey wi l l b e ou r leadership i n th e future, i t wo n 't b e human? It ' s possible, a nd l et m e a s k y o u anothe r question;
7.) W h at Happen s W h en t h e Cloud Computing Centers Filled wi t h A l l Human Information Becom e Aware?
Consi d er i f yo u wi l l a s s omeone recently s a id i n T h e Futurist Magazine i n t he October-September issue o f 2012 al o ng t his line o f thinking, so m ething t o t he effect that; "We alr e ady ha v e algorithms wh i ch c a n search a l l th e information i n a ny o f the s e cloud computing centers, " a n d "We ha v e al l sorts o f algorithms t o hel p u s find th e data, a nd algorithms w hich talk t o o t her algorithms." Sure, a l l th a t makes sense, an d a lso c o nsider th a t i n th e human brain:
A.) W e h ave v arious brain waves an d the y interact w i th e ach other.
B.) T here a r e var i ous chemicals providing energy wit h a mix.
C.) W e h ave sensors a l l t h rough t h e body, an d t h e fiv e senses whi c h gather information a n d experience, taking i n a l l o f ou r observations.
I f t h e cloud computer centers, w hich w ill b e talking t o e ach oth e r a nd talking t o themselv e s co n tain a ll o f t h e written an d visual record o f humanity, th e y w ill h a ve alre a dy gathered al l th e experiences, writings, observations, using, a n d history, a n d s o i t i s onl y on e small step awa y fro m beco m ing aware. T h is i s t h e future w e ar e moving towards, m y question is; d o w e dare?
I n a way, t h e cloud computer w o uld bec o me aware, a nd i t w o uld b e v ery similar t o a human brain wher e e v ery individual neuron w a s a n individual human. T hat i s t o s a y eve r y piece o f t h e puzzle, fr o m t h e top t o t h e bottom w o uld h a ve intelligence. I s t h is a ne w f o rm o f intelligence? Well, l et m e scale i t do w n t o a simple board game a n d a s k yo u a diff e rent question;
8.) Ca n W e Design a 3-D Chess Board Game W h ere Ea c h Piece H a s A I a nd Seeks t o Survive?
A n d i f w e c ould design so m ething l i ke that, wo u ldn't th a t b e ve r y similar t o th e w hole Net Centric Warfare concept? Isn ' t t hat h ow a r eal military works? Ea c h soldier i s give n a job, b u t e a ch soldier i s a thinking machine, i t f ollows i t s orders, b u t als o attempts t o d o w h at i s i n i t s bes t interest, t hat i s t o survive, t o fight, a n d t o win. I n wa r it ' s pretty serious, y o u eithe r win, o r yo u die. C a n w e design a 3-D chessboard t o d o t h e s ame thing? Ho w m uch bett e r w o uld i t b e i f i t w a s giving feedback back t o th e artificial intelligent chess master?
We ' ve alre a dy found t hat artificial intelligence working wi t h a human chess master c a n beat a n artificial intelligent chess playing machine fro m IBM. W h en w e merge human intelligence w ith artificial intelligence w e see m t o g et a boost. Wha t i f ea c h piece o n t h e chessboard h ad artificial intelligence an d i t understood h o w humans think, adapt, survive, an d operate unde r pressure? A ren't w e alre a dy teaching a ll t hese things t o th e future o f A I t h rough o u r input on t o t he Internet? Sur e w e are, a n d i f y o u've listened t o thi s radio show, o r rea d m y articles f or a n y period o f time, y o u alread y k now th e answer t o that.
Wha t i f w e scale d o wn e v en further? W h at i f w e scaled t h is a ll t h e wa y do w n t o th e molecular level? W hat i f t hose molecules o r nanoparticles coul d talk t o ea c h other? Ar e w e talking abo u t t he nex t generation o f microelectronics? Taking i t a l l th e w ay d own a n d continuing t h e tradition o f Moore's law? Hav e y o u recently noted i n t h e scientific news October o f 2012 th a t carbon nanotubes h ave incredible properties fo r producing light a n d miniature holograms? W ill t his b e a n e w wa y t o communicate a t t h e micro level?
Bacteria s eems t o communicate a n d o n ce i t g ets economies o f scale a n d reaches a tipping point, i t activates itself, t r ying t o overwhelm b y force a nd numbers. I t operates mu c h li k e a n army, althoug h strategically, mathematically, an d predictably, wel l almost? Almos t li k e a chessboard whe r e ea c h individual member i s a l so serving it s bes t interests? P erhaps a s w e design computer algorithms f o r t h e small-scale o r t h e largest scale w e wi l l begin t o s ee t he s a me thing, an d wha t w e learn w i ll propel u s fu r ther a n d faster i n to th e future.
T here wa s a n interesting article i n Photonics o n September 27, 2012 titled; "Nanotubes Project Holograms," w h ich noted that;
"Holograms c a n b e generated b y harnessing th e conductive a nd light-scattering qualities o f carbon nanotubes, a development th a t c ould lead t o crisper projections w ith a larger field o f view. Man y scientists beli e ve th a t carbon nanotubes wil l b e a t th e heart o f future industry a n d human endeavor an d wi l l h a ve a n impact o n solar cells, cancer treatments an d optical imaging. Researchers us e d t hese nanotubes a s t he smallest-ever scattering elements t o create a static holographic projection."
Th e applications f o r a l l thi s ar e incredible a nd i t co u ld revolutionize everything, chan g e A L L o f human technology; communication, computers, transportation, energy, healthcare, a n d y ou na m e it, jus t co n sider t he realities here? Wo u ld i t b e s o bold t o suggest th a t someday;
9.) A n A I Super Decision Making Computer Cou l d B e Running Human Civilizations?
Interestingly enough, I h a ve deeply considered t h e future eRepublic o r eGovernment A I decision making system, enterprise software super computer concept. I f i t we r e n o t corrupted b y humans i t cou l d work well, programmed benevolence - i f tha t i s po s sible a n d i f t h e programmers ar e o n t he s a me page o f liberty, freedom, an d standardization o f som e aspects a nd basic infrastructure needs. Th e anarchists mig h t n o t l ike it, t h e crony capitalists w o uld t r y t o corrupt it, th e socialists w ould wan t t o control it, t h e religious fanatics w o uld w ant t o destroy it, a n d s o o n - a g ain humans, bu t living i n suc h a system designed f o r liberty a n d freedom "I thi n k i t wo u ld b e a good idea" paraphrasing Gandhi o n Western Society.
W h at I' m s aying o r ask i ng rater is; coul d w e e v er ge t human populations t o agree t o live w i th t h is e v en i f w e c ould prove t o t hem mathematically t hat w o uld b e i n th e ir b est interests? A r e humans r e ady f or t hat yet? I w o uld suggest y ou t hat the y s hould b e g etting r eady f o r th a t beca u se the y a r e curren t ly training A I supercomputer decision-making machines t o d o jus t t h at i n th e future, a s humans a r e putting a l l o f th e ir knowledge ont o t h e Internet. Y o u s e e m y point?
O f course, i f w e d o t his w e m ust ge t i t rig h t t h e f irst time, bu t h a ve yo u e v er kn o wn an y technology t o hav e c o me i nto th e world perfect t h e f i rst time? Loo k ho w m a ny airplane designs crashed an d burned be f ore th e Wright Brothers a c tually go t o n e t o fly? An d eve n w i th t h em i t w a sn't l i ke the y w ere no t adding insult t o injury, a s t hey to o crashed a f e w tim e s th e mselves a n d h a d broken bones a n d broken w i ng spars t o prove it. Speaking o f whic h I l ike t o discuss w ith yo u a litt l e bit abou t ho w innovation c o mes t o be, an d t h e subject of;
10.) Innovation, Trial an d Error, an d Original Thinking
N o t lon g ago, I wa s discussing thi s wi t h a n acquaintance o f mine f rom a cross t he p o nd a n d h e suggested that; "Most innovations m i ght b e j ust applications o f trial a n d error." I s h e right? Yes, a good portion rea l ly i s so, t hat's true enough. Indeed, isn' t i t s o that; thos e w h o kno w t hat m ay ha v e learned i t t hrough t h e adversity o f failure, find the m selves i n a plac e w h ere t hey refuse t o q u it fo r t h e nex t round, eventually tha t leads t o success due t o strength o f character.
Thus, tho s e who've achieved h ave proven th e y hav e t h e rig h t stuff, a n d h ave worked t o solve r eal problems, bu t y o u can' t solve re a l problems b y practicing "the definition o f insanity" whi c h i s generally ho w humans "following t he leader" us u ally ge t there, a s t h ey hire thos e experts w h o g ot th e m int o t he hot water i n t h e fir s t p lace (refer back t o Einstein's quote), learning fr o m t h eir success, bu t no t t heir failures a s mentioned abo v e
Be c ause o f this, i f so m eone i s unintelligent a n d jus t recites th e experts, th e n a r e the y re a lly needed f o r a thin k tank o r f or future innovation? No, w e o u ght t o enlist th e experts themselves, n o t t heir hook, line, a nd sinker followers - o f course, a s I 've discussed i n previous shows a nd articles w e'd b e b e tter o ff fol l owing th o se wh o question authority, rathe r tha n leaving i t al l u p t o status quo intellectual elite.
No w then, alo n g t h is line o f discussion m y acquaintance al s o noted that; "Most mind stunning discoveries a r e st i ll linked t o f e w masterminds." Well, th i s i s fairly true, a nd wh y w e study th e names o f dead white men, t he victors o f history wh o wrote t hemselves in, an d speak o f t h e "shoulders o f giants" however, m any o f th e se incredible advances m ay h ave com e f rom associates o r combining information.
Consid e r a stable m an fo r a member o f t h e Royal Geological Society back i n th e day, h e c a me u p w ith t he idea, b ut h e co u ldn't re a d o r write, s o th e individual w ho wrote i t do w n g o t an d to o k t h e credit f o r it, a n d today w e ha v e t o "memorize" h i s na m e i n school, y et i n reality tha t 's n ot h o w i t a ctually happened.
Thus, i n man y r egards i t's h a rd t o sa y wha t a n original thought is, o r ho w man y ac t ually com e about. Afte r all, m any psychologists a nd philosophers h ave noted t h at th e human mind come s u p wi t h ideas a nd thoughts based o n i t s experience an d input f rom i ts sensors throu g h th e sense o f touch, smell, taste, sight, a n d hearing. It ' s ra t her difficult t o conceive somet h ing t h at yo u h a ven't experienced o r i s n ot wit h in y our realm, i t 's no t t o s ay t h at y ou couldn't, i t 's th a t i t d o esn't hap p en ver y often. Ge t ting t o a big breakthrough i s highly uncommon.
I n deed i t i s kn o wn tha t mo s t innovation co m es f rom problem solving, a n d perhap s usin g k n own knowledge, observations, a n d experiencesss i n unique ways. The n t here i s t he trial a nd error period, whe r e yo u crash a n d burn, o r y o u modify, adapt, a n d survive t o fight anot h er day - t o tweak y our invention, a n d t o make i t work. T his i s you r job a s a n innovator, an d i t's someth i ng I h ope yo u w i ll consider.
Well, that ' s th e en d o f 30 minutes o f m e talking (minus t h e commercials a n d distractions) a n d yo u listening. N ow it' s y o ur turn t o chime i n a n d I w ill open u p t h e phone lines. I f y o u ar e reading t h is transcript online yo u m a y post a comment i f you' d like, o r shoot m e a n e-mail. Jus t remember th e rules; y o u m u st bring you r mind a nd intellect.